MILLER v. ROSEMOUNT, INC

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 84-75.

Attorney(S)

Kronzer, Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Ballard Friend by John R. Leach, III, Houston, Tex., for appellant. William McLeod, Jr., Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant, Carroll. Stockwell, Sievert, Viccellio, Clements Shaddock, Fred H. Sievert, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee, Rosemount, Inc. Homer C. Singleton, Jr., Lake Charles, for plaintiffs-appellants, Raymond and Ida Miller. Allen L. Smith, Jr., Plauche, Smith Nieset, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees. Mouton Roy, Alan K. Breaux, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee, Badger and Sons. Kathleen Manning, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant, Ralph M. Parson Co. Raggio, Cappel, Chozen Berniard, Thomas L. Raggio, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee, Newtron. John A. Jeansonne of Jeansonne, Briney Goudelocke, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee, Johnson Controls, Inc. Woodley, Barnett, Cox, Williams, Fenet Palmer, J.L. Cox, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee, Moore Products. Dubuisson Dubuisson, Edward B. Dubuisson, Opelousas, for defendant-appellee, Magnetrol Engineering. Cox Cox, James J. Cox, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant, James K. Hedrick. Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier McElligott, Richard C. Meaux, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee, Fisher Controls, Inc. Jones, Tete, Nolen, Hanchey, Swift Spears, Gregory P. Massey, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellants, Concoc, et al.

Judges

FORET, Judge.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

RAYMOND MILLER AND IDA MILLER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ROSEMOUNT, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned this date in Carroll v. Newtron, Inc., 477 So.2d 719 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1985), (our docket number 84-73, with which this case is consolidated on appeal), the decision of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part as follows:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of Fisher Controls, Inc., and E.B. Badger Sons Company and its successor corporation, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation, against plaintiffs, Raymond Miller and Ida Miller, and all third party plaintiffs are hereby granted, dismissing these plaintiffs' claims against defendants with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of Rosemount, Inc.; Magnetrol International, Inc.; Ronan, Inc.; Moore Products Co.; Newtron, Inc.; S.I.P. Engineering, Inc.; and Johnson Controls, Inc. against plaintiffs, Raymond Miller and Ida Miller, and all third party plaintiffs, are hereby denied.

All costs at the trial level and of this appeal shall await final disposition of this matter.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

RAYMOND MILLER AND IDA MILLER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ROSEMOUNT, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

Comments