AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL CUSICK, Also Known as THOMAS CUSICK, Appellant.

Judgments affirmed.

By pleading guilty defendant has waived his claim that he was not brought to trial within the 180-day statutory limit of the Agreement on Detainers (CPL 580.20 [III] [a]). The rights afforded by the Agreement on Detainers are neither fundamental nor constitutionally guaranteed ( United States v. Lawson, 736 F.2d 835; United States v. Scheer, 729 F.2d 164; United States v Palmer, 574 F.2d 164, cert denied 437 U.S. 907) and a violation of the procedural rules contained therein is not a jurisdictional defect which may survive a guilty plea ( People v. Vidal, 85 A.D.2d 701). Nor do the circumstances demonstrate a violation of defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.20; People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CUSICK
(May 13, 1985)