Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHARON FRANKLET, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. DINAH BACHRACH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In these eleven cases, which were consolidated for this hearing, the appellants all filed income tax returns making claims for war tax credits or deductions. The Internal Revenue Service penalized the appellants for filing "frivolous" income tax returns ( 26 U.S.C. § 6702) for the year 1982. Appellants challenged the assessments in the District Court for the Northern District of California. Judgments in favor of the United States were entered in all cases. For the reasons stated in the opinion in Franklet v. United States, 578 F. Supp. 1552 (N.D.Cal. 1984), we affirm the judgments.

One opinion was written to decide eight of the cases which had been consolidated. Another judge, relying on the opinion in Franklet, entered judgment in the three remaining cases, which also had been consolidated.

We note that, since the decision in Franklet, similar results have been reached in Wall v. United States, 756 F.2d 52 (8th Cir. 1985); Kahn v. United States, 753 F.2d 1208 (3d Cir. 1985); and Welch v. United States, 750 F.2d 1101 (1st Cir. 1985). See also Jenney v. United States, 755 F.2d 1384 (9th Cir. 1985).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRANKLET v. UNITED STATES
(May 21, 1985)