Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of THOMAS H. JONES, Appellant, v. KAREN A. JONES, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division's determination that no compelling reason for change of the original custody arrangement had been shown more nearly comports with the weight of the evidence than does the contrary determination of the Family Judge. In this setting there is no abuse of discretion.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER concur; Judge TITONE taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF JONES v. JONES
(May 28, 1985)