AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT DUDASIK, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The victim's in-court identification of defendant was reliable, satisfied the required standards and was not tainted by his failure to identify defendant's picture out of a photo array. Although defendant suffered from depression and was suicidal and had been hospitalized prior to trial because of these problems, there is no basis in this record to question his competence to stand trial (see, People v. Armlin, 37 N.Y.2d 167, 171; People v. Colville, 74 A.D.2d 928). Finally, assuming that the People's witness Manillo was an accomplice, his testimony was cumulative and was corroborated by the victim and police (see, People v. Pelc, 101 A.D.2d 995).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DUDASIK
(Jun 4, 1985)