Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

TOVA FARAGO et al., Appellants, v. HOWARD SHULMAN et al., Respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 104 A.D.2d 965; see also, Tebbutt v Virostek, 65 N.Y.2d 931).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Judge JASEN dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Tebbutt v Virostek ( 65 N.Y.2d 931). Taking no part: Judges MEYER and TITONE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FARAGO v. SHULMAN
(Jun 13, 1985)