Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to defendant husband's contention, Special Term was not obligated to consider the nine specific factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a) in determining this application for pendente lite relief ( see, Lewis v. Lewis, 103 A.D.2d 714; Belfiglio v. Belfiglio, 99 A.D.2d 462; Berley v Berley, 97 A.D.2d 726; Liss v. Liss, 87 A.D.2d 681). Special Term's decision, in which it set forth the reasons for the determination reached, complied with the statutory directive (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [b]; [7] [d]). Under the circumstances, Special Term's awards of pendente lite relief were not excessive. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.