Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Louis DUELMER v. Ray HAND

APPEAL ERROR — ABSTRACTING — DISMISSAL IS REMEDY FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ABSTRACTING RULES. — The lower court's opinion is the heart of any appeal; appellant's failure to abstract the order, judgment or decree appealed from requires dismissal. [Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 9(d) and (e).]

JOHN I. PURTLE, Justice.

Among items not abstracted, which causes us to dismiss this appeal under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 9 (d) and (e), is the order, judgment or decree appealed from. The lower court's decision is the heart of any appeal. The abstract does not reveal that there has been any final disposition of the merits of this case. A reading of the Rule 9 opinion written for the court by Justice Byrd and reported as Bank of Ozark v. Isaacs, 263 Ark. 113, 563 S.W.2d 707 (1978) is most instructive. In addition to our own rules last published in the reports at 279 Ark. 497 (1983) and also published in volume 3 A of the Arkansas Statutes, several publishing firms offer updated rules for sale to the public.

Appeal dismissed.

GEORGE ROSE SMITH, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUELMER v. HAND
(Jul 1, 1985)