AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. RANDY GUSHLAW, Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the court erred in granting defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 without holding a hearing ( see, People v Russo, 78 A.D.2d 557), the defect was cured when the court held a hearing on the People's motion to reargue. It was also error to charge the People with the 19 days during which they failed to furnish the minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings. CPL 30.30 is a trial readiness rule; delay occasioned by the People's failure to comply with discovery requests does not affect their continued readiness to proceed to trial ( see, People v. Alicea, 109 A.D.2d 1083; People v. Runion, 107 A.D.2d 1080). In the context of these proceedings, however, the error was harmless ( see, People v Gushlaw [appeal No. 2], 112 A.D.2d 792).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GUSHLAW
(Jul 12, 1985)