Judgment affirmed, with costs.
We find no merit in defendant's contentions that the court failed to sufficiently marshal the evidence or that its marshaling was unbalanced or prejudicial ( Green v. Downs, 27 N.Y.2d 205; Theodoropoulos v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 90 A.D.2d 792; Blaize v. City of New York, 80 A.D.2d 594). The court adequately discussed the evidence and related it to the pertinent principles of law and to each party's arguments ( Green v. Downs, supra, p 208). The charge as a whole conveyed no impression that the court had an opinion on the merits of the case ( Theodoropoulos v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., supra).
We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.