ALDRICH v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

83-AB-1580; CA A29512

Attorney(S)

Donald S. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Kathryn T. Whalen, and Richardson Murphy, Portland. William F. Nessly, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem. No appearance by respondent Northwest Marine Iron Works.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

83-AB-1580; CA A29512

Attorney(S)

Donald S. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Kathryn T. Whalen, and Richardson Murphy, Portland. William F. Nessly, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem. No appearance by respondent Northwest Marine Iron Works.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ALDRICH et al, Petitioners, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al, Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Buttler, P. J., specially concurring.

BUTTLER, P. J., specially concurring.

For the reasons stated in my dissent in Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or. App. 93, 694 P.2d 1025 (1985), 1 would reverse the decision of EAB. However, unlike in Cropley, it appears that some of the petitioners here may have joined the strike and would not be entitled to unemployment compensation. Barrier v. Employment Division, 29 Or. App. 387, 563 P.2d 1230 (1977). Accordingly, I would remand this case for a determination limited to which petitioners, if any, joined the strike.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.