SACK v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CITY OF NEW YORK, N.Y., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Charles J. Moxley, Jr., for appellants. Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Michael C. Harwood of counsel), for Board of Elections of City of New York, respondent. Raymond B. Harding, respondent pro se, and for Carol Bellamy and others, respondents.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Charles J. Moxley, Jr., for appellants. Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Michael C. Harwood of counsel), for Board of Elections of City of New York, respondent. Raymond B. Harding, respondent pro se, and for Carol Bellamy and others, respondents.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BERNARD SACK et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents. CARL F. GRILLO, Respondent,

Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the holding of the referee, confirmed by Special Term and affirmed by the Appellate Division, that objection to the validity of the New York County County Committee of the Liberal Party, by whomever made, was required to be made within 10 days after the October 1984 organizational meeting of the Committee, at the latest (Election Law § 16-102).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

SACK v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CITY OF NEW YORK

BERNARD SACK et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents. CARL F. GRILLO, Respondent,

Comments