AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JUDITH ARSLANIAN et al., Respondents, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., et al., Appellants, and CHARLES DISTASIO, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And Other Actions.)

Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

This record presents triable issues of fact as to whether the brakes on the plaintiffs Arslanians' Volkswagen were defective, whether such defect was a proximate cause of the accident, and whether a reasonable inspection would have revealed the alleged defect. Evidence was presented in the plaintiffs' experts' reports that the master cylinder union in the Volkswagen brake system was improperly assembled, and that this would have caused problems with braking and steering.

As appellants introduced no expert evidence of their own, these reports, together with the examinations before trial, were enough to defeat the summary judgment motions. Appellants' argument that the accident would have occurred even if the brakes were functioning perfectly is not dispositive here, since faulty brakes could have contributed to the direction and intensity of the impact thereby enhancing or aggravating the injured plaintiff's injuries (see, Bolm v Triumph Corp., 33 N.Y.2d 151).

The argument by Valley Stream Volkswagen, Inc. that the defect could not have been discovered during a reasonable inspection is also without merit. One of plaintiffs' experts states in his report that he visually detected the defect, and both experts agree that it was quite possible that a fitting was left off during assembly. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARSLANIAN v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC
(Sep 23, 1985)