AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PENN COMPRESSION MOULDING, INC. v. MAR-BAL, INC.

PER CURIAM.

This was an action to recover commissions allegedly due plaintiff as a result of a contract between plaintiff and defendant. The facts of this case are fully and accurately set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals and need not be repeated herein.

After reviewing the records and briefs and hearing the oral argument question presented by this appeal, we conclude that the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is correct and should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PENN COMPRESSION MOULDING, INC. v. MAR-BAL, INC
(Oct 1, 1985)