Judgment affirmed.
Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court's charge was deficient because the jury was not informed that he had to share his coperpetrator's intent to commit a robbery with a gun. However, defendant made no objection to the Judge's charge and, therefore, the alleged error has not been preserved for our review (see, People v Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467; CPL 470.05). In any event, we find that the Trial Judge's charge was in conformity with Penal Law § 160.15 and no error was committed. The People need not establish that defendant knew his coperpetrator intended to use a deadly weapon (see, People v Parker, 97 A.D.2d 943; cf. People v Gomez, 87 A.D.2d 829). O'Connor, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.