Order affirmed. It is clear from this record that the sentencing court did consider "the nature and circumstances of the crime and * * * the history and character of the defendant" (Penal Law § 70.02 [c] [i]), correctly including whether, in view of defendant's physical condition, a sentence of imprisonment would be "unduly harsh". Thus, it cannot be said that the court failed to exercise its discretion or abused that discretion as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.