Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

WALTER HANDLIN et al., Plaintiffs, and PETER MATAXES, Appellant, v. V. RENATO BURKHART et al., Respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order dated May 21, 1984, insofar as it dismissed the complaint as to plaintiff Mataxes, affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 101 A.D.2d 850).

Appeal from the order dated August 22, 1984 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HANDLIN, MATAXES v. BURKHART
(Oct 15, 1985)