Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

GAIL W. RESNICK et al., Appellants, v. H. JOEL GRIBETZ, Respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted. There is no evidence in this record to support a finding of express, as opposed to implied, assumption of risk ( compare, Arbegast v Board of Educ., 65 N.Y.2d 161). The trial court erred in charging the jury, over plaintiff's objection, that a finding of assumption of risk would bar recovery.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and TITONE. Taking no part: Judge ALEXANDER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RESNICK v. GRIBETZ
(Oct 22, 1985)