Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

The STATE, Appellant, v. Clifton McKNIGHT, Le

ORDER Oct. 22, 1985.

This appeal is from an order granting respondents' motion to suppress evidence that was seized pursuant to an allegedly defective search warrant. The State petitions for a writ of mandamus or supersedeas to allow admission of the evidence. The State asserts the suppression order significantly impairs the prosecution of its case. Because neither mandamus nor supersedeas is an appropriate form of relief in this case, we deny the State's petition.

We take this opportunity, however, to address respondents' contention that the suppression order is not directly appealable. A pre-trial order granting the suppression of evidence which significantly impairs the prosecution of a criminal case is directly appealable under S.C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330(2)(a) (1976). To the extent our opinion in State v. Thomas, 275 S.C. 274, 269 S.E.2d 768 (1980), is inconsistent with this view, it is overruled.

Accordingly, the trial in this case is stayed until a decision on the merits of the appeal.

It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. McKNIGHT
(Oct 22, 1985)