Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. BRUNCE SMITH, Also Known as BRUCE SMITH, NAT SMITH and NATHANIEL DICKERSON, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to the Appellate Division for consideration of the facts (CPL 470.40 [b]; 470.25 [2] [d]).

Defendant was present when his case was assigned to Trial Part and was made aware by the assigning judge's instructions that should the parties run out of witnesses at the pretrial hearing, requiring that the hearing be adjourned, the trial was to begin at that point, or, in any event, immediately following the conclusion of the hearing. Thus, by absconding after the third day of the hearing, defendant forfeited his right to be present at trial (People v Sanchez, 65 N.Y.2d 436).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SMITH
(Oct 24, 1985)