Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BOATRIGHT et al. v. SUNSHINE TOYOTA, INC. et al.

POPE, Judge.

The verdict of a jury is not an appealable judgment under the Appellate Practice Act. Ameagle Contractors v. Couch Constr. Co., 141 Ga. App. 94 ( 232 S.E.2d 619) (1977). See generally OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). "Whether the verdict resulted from direction, as here, or was by deliberation is of no decisive consequence." Hurst v. Starr, 226 Ga. 42 ( 172 S.E.2d 604) (1970), overruled on other grounds, Steele v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 252 Ga. 58 ( 311 S.E.2d 470) (1984). In the case at bar appellants bring this appeal from a jury verdict entered at the direction of the trial court in favor of appellees. There is no entry of judgment of record. See OCGA § 9-11-58. Compare Steele v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., supra; Crowe v. Holloway Dev. Corp., 114 Ga. App. 856 (1) ( 152 S.E.2d 913) (1966). "In the absence of an appealable judgment, this court has no jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed." Ameagle Contractors v. Couch Constr. Co., supra. See also Pilgrim v. Brookfield West, 136 Ga. App. 619 (1) ( 222 S.E.2d 137) (1975).

Appeal dismissed. Deen, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

POPE, Judge.

DECIDED OCTOBER 28, 1985.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOATRIGHT v. SUNSHINE TOYOTA, INC
(Oct 28, 1985)