Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Compensation of Betty E. Madaras, Claimant. MADARAS, Petitioner, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION et al, Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks reversal of a Board order which reversed the referee's determination that claimant is permanently and totally disabled for the reason that she has made no attempt to seek work, as required by ORS 656.206(3). SAIF argues that, because claimant is not totally disabled from a physical standpoint, she should be required to seek work to confirm her unemployability, unless the evidence of unemployability is clear and convincing. SAIF concedes that claimant has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would be futile for her to seek work. That is all that is required. See Morris v. Denny's, 50 Or. App. 533, 623 P.2d 1118 (1981).

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MADARAS v. SAIF
(Oct 30, 1985)