AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

EQUINE PRACTITIONERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE RACING AND WAGERING BOARD, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein, and, as so modified, affirmed.

We reject plaintiff's challenge to the rules promulgated by defendant which govern the substances which may be administered to a horse within various time periods preceding a race. We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sidney Asch ( 105 A.D.2d 215), that these rules are rationally related to, and authorized by, the statutory provisions they implement, and thus we affirm the declaration as to their validity. We do not reach plaintiff's challenge to those rules which authorize warrantless searches of all licensees anywhere on racetrack premises. In view of the concession by defendant that these rules do not apply to licensed veterinarians, who are exempt from the proscriptions which such searches are intended to enforce, plaintiff lacks standing to challenge, on the merits, the rules authorizing warrantless searches. Accordingly, we modify the order of the Appellate Division by deleting the declaration insofar as it relates to the rules as to warrantless searches.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, KAYE and TITONE concur; Judges SIMONS and ALEXANDER taking no part.

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EQUINE PRACTITIONERS v. STATE RACING AND WAGERING BD
(Nov 12, 1985)