Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. FRANK DI NAPOLI, Respondent.

Order reversed, defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment denied, and indictment reinstated. Having reviewed the transcript of the testimony before the Grand Jury, we agree with the dissenter at the Appellate Division that the circumstantial evidence presented was such that "if unexplained and uncontradicted would warrant conviction by a trial jury" and thus was legally sufficient (People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97, 105; People v Mayo, 36 N.Y.2d 1002; CPL 70.10).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DI NAPOLI
(Nov 14, 1985)