Judgment affirmed.
The trial court's evidentiary rulings were either correct (see, People v Love, 92 A.D.2d 551) or the claimed errors were unpreserved for review and, if incorrect, constituted harmless error (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969). Nor does the alleged prosecutorial misconduct warrant reversal (see, People v Caruso, 45 N.Y.2d 881). The sentence imposed, although the maximum permissible, was not an abuse of discretion (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Gibbons, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.