Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The order of respondent Marasco was supported by substantial evidence in the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Jenkins v Martin, 99 A.D.2d 811; Matter of David H., 96 Misc.2d 117). Good cause existed for the denial of the license (see, Penal Law § 400.00). Mollen, P.J., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.