Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

MENARD M. GERTLER, Appellant, v. JOSEPH GOODGOLD et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division ( 107 A.D.2d 481). We add with respect to the Statute of Limitations question that this is not a case, such as Mundy v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn. ( 44 N.Y.2d 352), where by withdrawing its determination the respondent created an impression of nonfinality with respect to plaintiff's allocated space. The letter of March 11, 1982 ended with the statement that "reorganizational plans are already firm." That defendants continued to negotiate with plaintiff thereafter did not extend the four-month period of limitations (CPLR 217) (Matter of Lubin v Board of Educ., 60 N.Y.2d 974).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GERTLER v. GOODGOLD
(Dec 17, 1985)