Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OLLICE DAVIS, SR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS J. MILLS, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an award of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 to a prevailing defendant in a civil rights case. Without making specific findings, the district court granted $10,000 attorney's fees plus $564.80 in costs to the defendant school board. The plaintiff now appeals.

Christiansburg Garment Co. v. E.E.O.C., 434 U.S. 412, 98 S.Ct. 694, 54 L.Ed.2d 648 (1978), provides:

[A] plaintiff should not be assessed his opponent's attorney's fees unless a court finds that his claim was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless, or that the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.

The trial court's failure to make the specific findings required by the Christiansburg rule for award of attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant necessitates our vacation of its award. The case will be REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings including a hearing. We express no opinion as to whether fees should or should not be awarded to this defendant.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. MILLS
(Dec 12, 1985)