Judgment affirmed.
The trial court's Sandoval ruling was proper. It reflected due consideration of the criteria set out in People v Sandoval ( 34 N.Y.2d 371) and successfully balanced the competing interests of the defendant and the People. In addition, we conclude that the imposed sentence of 5 to 10 years' imprisonment on the defendant's burglary conviction was not unduly harsh or excessive and did not constitute an abuse of the sentencing court's discretion (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Gibbons, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.