Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

BARNEY EARL CRUTCHFIELD, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, JIM SMITH, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN [2] BANC [3] (Opinion October 3, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 772 F.2d 839)

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRUTCHFIELD v. WAINWRIGHT
(Dec 19, 1985)