Judgment affirmed.
There was sufficient evidence adduced at the suppression hearing to support the court's finding of probable cause to arrest defendant, since the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer at the time of defendant's apprehension were such as would warrant a prudent person to conclude that defendant had committed the burglary which the officer had been called to investigate (CPL 140.10 [b]; see, People v Oden, 36 N.Y.2d 382; People v Tucker, 101 A.D.2d 599).
We further find that the People proved defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620). Lazer, J.P., Rubin, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.