Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

IN RE the MARRIAGE OF: Judith M. STEINKE, Petitioner-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Robert Allen STEINKE, Respondent.

(Originally reported in 126 Wis.2d 372, 276 N.W.2d 839 (1985).)

PER CURIAM.

(On motion for reconsideration). The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.

In In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis.2d 372, 389, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), immediately above the mandate, we delete the phrase "the actuarial present value of the entire interest at the time of trial was approximately $15,900."

We add the following sentence immediately above the mandate: An opinion as to actuarial present value was included in the record as an answer to an interrogatory, i.e., $15,900, but was not received in evidence. The amount is not conclusive on remand. The trial court must evaluate and include the interest in the pension in the property division; the parties may introduce evidence of the value of the pension interest.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. STEINKE
(Jan 24, 1986)