Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This appeal arose from an order of the Commonwealth Court entered September 12, 1985, reported at 91 Pa. Commw. 600 and 498 A.2d 1364 (1985). [1]

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
91 Pa. Commw. 600, 498 A.2d 1364 (1985) The opinion does not identify a specific rule or principle. The cited decision is identified as the Commonwealth Court order from which the appeal was taken. [1]

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court issued a brief per curiam order and provided no substantive analysis. It affirmed the Commonwealth Court's order. [1][2]

Holding and Implications

ORDER AFFIRMED. The Commonwealth Court's order remained in effect. [2]

The opinion discusses no broader implications; no new precedent was set.

E-Z PARKS, INC., Appellant at No. 128, v. Thomas D. LARSON, Secretary of Transportation, Commonwealth of Pennsyl

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

E-Z PARKS, INC. v. LARSON
(Jan 31, 1986)