LaFLUER v. HOLLIER

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 84-287.

Attorney(S)

Edwards, Stefanski Barousser, James M. Cunningham, III, Crowley, Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier McElligott, Richard Meaux, Lafayette, for defendants-
John Haas Weinstein, Opelousas, for plaintiff-

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 84-287.

Attorney(S)

Edwards, Stefanski Barousser, James M. Cunningham, III, Crowley, Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier McElligott, Richard Meaux, Lafayette, for defendants-
John Haas Weinstein, Opelousas, for plaintiff-

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ARLEN LAFLEUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. F. HOLLIER SONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

KING, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Larry Fontenot v. F. Hollier Sons, 478 So.2d 1379 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1985), the trial court judgment is affirmed.

All costs of this appeal are assessed to defendants-appellants.

AFFIRMED.

DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in No. 84-288, handed down this date.

[5] DOMENGEAUX, Judge, concurring.

I concur, See my concurring opinion in No. 84-288, Fontenot v. Hollier, et al., handed down this date.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.