On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 112 A.D.2d 687). We add only that unlike Matter of 12 Cornelia St. (Ross) ( 56 N.Y.2d 895), the evidence here indicates the employer was able to exercise control over the activities of its salespersons beyond the requirements of applicable governmental regulation.
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.