Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. HAROLD BENDELL, Respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of the facts (CPL 470.25 [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]). We agree with the dissenting Justices below ( 111 A.D.2d 87, 89-91) that any error of the prosecutor, in referring to his pretrial involvement in the case, was harmless (see, People v Paperno, 54 N.Y.2d 294; People v Ortiz, 54 N.Y.2d 288) and that the prosecutor's cross-examination of defendant's character witnesses was proper (see, People v Kuss, 32 N.Y.2d 436). There is no ground, therefore, for holding that defendant has been deprived of his fundamental right to a fair trial by the prosecutor's conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BENDELL
(Feb 13, 1986)