EHRLICH, Justice.
We have for review Haywood v. State, 466 So.2d 424 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), which directly conflicts with Whitehead v. State, 450 So.2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. On the authority of State v. Whitehead, 472 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1985), we approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur.