Judgment affirmed.
Inasmuch as there was no identification procedure conducted by the police, no preliminary hearing on this matter was required. The question of the accuracy of the complainant's identification was properly left within the province of the jury (see, People v Dukes, 97 A.D.2d 445).
The defendant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Gibbons, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.