AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ASTOL, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact have been considered and determined to have been established.

The trial court erred in denying the defense counsel's several requests to charge that the People must disprove the defendant's alibi beyond a reasonable doubt. Such an instruction is an important element of any charge on the issue of alibi. The trial court must unequivocally convey this burden of proof to the jury (see, e.g., People v. Victor, 62 N.Y.2d 374).

In addition, the court's charge on interested witnesses was unbalanced in that it stressed the application of that rule to the defense witnesses without any mention of the People's witnesses to whom it might have also applied (cf. People v Gadsden, 80 A.D.2d 508).

In view of the prejudicial effect of these errors, the defendant is entitled to a new trial. Lawrence, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ASTOL
(Mar 3, 1986)