Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JOHN E. REINHARDT PLUMBING, INC., Appellant, v. NORRIS et al, Defendants, IWASAKI et ux, Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, a subcontractor, seeks to recover from defendants Iwasaki on a theory of unjust enrichment for amounts that it alleges it was not paid by the general contractor for work done on the Iwasakis' residence. Defendants moved for summary judgment (supported by an affidavit) on plaintiff's amended complaint. Plaintiff's answering affidavit did not show any material issue of fact which would support its claim of unjust enrichment, and there was no error in granting the motion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHN E. REINHARDT PLUMBING v. NORRIS
(Mar 12, 1986)