Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JOHN E. POGGI et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, and SAMUEL DE MILIA, Indi

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan. We note that we do not reach the question whether the variable supplements funds constitute a pension or retirement benefit. That question is unnecessary to the determination of the issues before us: whether plaintiffs' pension contract rights or their equal protection rights have been impaired. (See also, Matter of Lippman v Board of Educ., 66 N.Y.2d 313.)

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur; Judge ALEXANDER taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POGGI v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Mar 18, 1986)