Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GIBSON v. PIERCE.

PER CURIAM.

After plenary consideration of this matter ( Gibson v. Pierce, 176 Ga. App. 287 ( 335 S.E.2d 658) (1985)), it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore vacated.

All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., and Smith, J., who dissent.

PER CURIAM.

DECIDED MARCH 18, 1986.

MARSHALL, Presiding Justice, dissenting.

For the reasons given in Judge Beasley's dissenting opinion, I would reverse the judgment of the trial court in this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GIBSON v. PIERCE
(Mar 18, 1986)