STATE v. MARSHALL

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

(12692)

Attorney(S)

Louis S. Avitabile, with whom, on the brief, was Richard v. Ackerson, for the appellant (defendant). Marcia B. Smith, assistant state's attorney, with whom were Patricia King, deputy assistant state's attorney, and, on the brief, John Connelly, state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

(12692)

Attorney(S)

Louis S. Avitabile, with whom, on the brief, was Richard v. Ackerson, for the appellant (defendant). Marcia B. Smith, assistant state's attorney, with whom were Patricia King, deputy assistant state's attorney, and, on the brief, John Connelly, state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KEITH MARSHALL

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and after considering the briefs and the arguments of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. The issues have been fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; State v. Marshall, 3 Conn. App. 126, 485 A.2d 930 (1985); and it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion therein contained.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KEITH MARSHALL

Comments