Judgment affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's claim, the court properly admitted into evidence the tape-recorded conversation between himself and Police Officer Curie. Police Officer Curie's testimony that the tape recording was a true and accurate record of his conversation with the defendant, and that nothing had been deleted or added to the conversation, provided a sufficient foundation for the admission of the tape into evidence (see, People v. McGee, 49 N.Y.2d 48, cert denied sub nom. Waters v. New York, 446 U.S. 942; People v. Arena, 48 N.Y.2d 944; People v. Tayeh, 96 A.D.2d 1045). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.