AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVID PARKER et al., Respondents, v. VISTA CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTS, INC., Appellant

MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

In our opinion, the plaintiff subcontractors, notwithstanding their failure to obtain a home improvement license, may enforce their contract against the defendant contractor, since the purpose of the requirement of a license is to "safeguard and protect the home owner" (Administrative Code of City of New York § B32-350.0; see also, Rosasco Creameries v Cohen, 276 N.Y. 274, 280; 12 N.Y. Jur 2d, Business and Occupations, § 43; cf. Zimmett v Professional Acoustics, 103 Misc.2d 971). We do not construe the term, "owner", as used in the code, to include a contractor vis-a-vis a subcontractor (see, Administrative Code § B32-351.0 [4]).

KASSOFF, J.P., MONTELEONE and LERNER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARKER v. VISTA CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTS, INC
(Apr 10, 1986)