TRINITY AMBULANCE SERV., v. GL AMBULANCE SERV

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 838, Docket 85-7974.

Attorney(S)

Eliot B. Gerstein, Hartford, Conn. (Allan W. Koerner, Gersten Gersten, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. Sidney T. Schulman, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff-appellant Aetna Ambulance Service, Inc. Anthony J. Palermino, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellee L M Ambulance Corp. Martin S. Stillman, Rocky Hill, Conn., for defendant-appellee Professional Ambulance Service, Inc. James A. Wade, Hartford, Conn. (Janet C. Hall, Theodore J. Tucci, Robinson Cole, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for defendant-appellee City of Hartford. Arthur A. Palmunen, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellee G L Ambulance Services, Inc.

Judges

James Lowell Oakes
Ralph K. Winter
George Cheney Pratt

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 838, Docket 85-7974.

Attorney(S)

Eliot B. Gerstein, Hartford, Conn. (Allan W. Koerner, Gersten Gersten, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. Sidney T. Schulman, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff-appellant Aetna Ambulance Service, Inc. Anthony J. Palermino, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellee L M Ambulance Corp. Martin S. Stillman, Rocky Hill, Conn., for defendant-appellee Professional Ambulance Service, Inc. James A. Wade, Hartford, Conn. (Janet C. Hall, Theodore J. Tucci, Robinson Cole, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for defendant-appellee City of Hartford. Arthur A. Palmunen, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellee G L Ambulance Services, Inc.

Judges

James Lowell Oakes
Ralph K. Winter
George Cheney Pratt

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

TRINITY AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., AETNA AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. G L AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC., CITY OF HARTFORD, AND L M AMBULANCE CORP., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

Assuming arguendo that the contracts entered into by the City of Hartford would have violated the antitrust laws but for the "state action" exemption, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Cabranes in his opinion, 625 F.Supp. 142 (D.Conn. 1985).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

TRINITY AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., AETNA AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. G L AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC., CITY OF HARTFORD, AND L M AMBULANCE CORP., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

Comments