Judgment affirmed.
The error now alleged by the defendant, a denial of his right to confront adverse witnesses, was not raised in the court of first instance, where counsel objected only to the good-faith basis of the challenged cross-examination questions. The issue was therefore not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Qualls, 55 N.Y.2d 733).
We have examined the defendant's other contentions, and they are without merit. Rubin, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.