AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL KAY, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

By not moving to withdraw his guilty plea in the court of first instance, the defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review any issue of law as to the alleged insufficiency in the plea allocution (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636).

By his guilty plea, the defendant effectively waived any claim that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30 (see, People v. Thill, 52 N.Y.2d 1020; People v. Friscia, 51 N.Y.2d 845; People v. Walker, 109 A.D.2d 858). Furthermore, it does not appear that the court erred in rejecting the defendant's constitutionally based speedy-trial claim (People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442). Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KAY
(Apr 28, 1986)