AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KARL EHMER et al., Respondents, v. MODERNISMO PUBLICATIONS, LTD., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The plaintiffs' time to comply with items 2, 3 and 4 of the appellants' notice for discovery is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, and the appellants' time to appear at the plaintiffs' business offices to inspect certain of the business records demanded to be produced for inspection is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Public policy favors a determination of actions on their merits and the sound discretion of Special Term is to be afforded some latitude in determining what is an excusable default (Krystofic v Rapisardi, 112 A.D.2d 196; Picotte Realty v Aragona, 87 A.D.2d 955). In view of the lack of prejudice to the appellants, the absence of willful noncompliance on the plaintiffs' part, and the potential meritorious nature of the action as set forth in the verified complaint, we find that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in excusing the plaintiffs' default (see, Stark v Marine Power Light Co., 99 A.D.2d 753). Mollen, P.J., Weinstein, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EHMER v. MODERNISMO PUBLICATIONS, LTD
(May 5, 1986)