Order modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the award of temporary maintenance from $600 per week to $300 per week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The purpose of temporary maintenance is "to insure that the needy spouse is provided with sufficient funds to meet his or her reasonable needs pending trial" (Belfiglio v Belfiglio, 99 A.D.2d 462). To this end, the court in fixing a temporary award must consider and accommodate the competing factors of the reasonable needs of the spouse seeking support and the financial means of the supporting spouse to meet those needs (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]; Colin v Colin, 113 A.D.2d 817; Stern v Stern, 106 A.D.2d 631; Van Ess v Van Ess, 100 A.D.2d 848).
In the instant case, the record discloses that the defendant cannot meet the financial obligations imposed upon him by Special Term's order without virtually exhausting his entire net monthly income. Hence, the circumstances of this case warrant a reduction of temporary maintenance to a figure of $300 per week (see, Colin v Colin, supra; Van Ess v Van Ess, supra). In our view, this amount suffices to meet the plaintiff's expenses and constitutes a reasonable accommodation between the parties.
We discern no error in the award of temporary child support, as said award is reasonable in view of the ages and needs of the parties' children (see generally, Colin v Colin, supra). We further find the remaining portions of Special Term's order to be proper. Lawrence, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.